Estimating Reviewer Credibility Using Review Contents and Review Histories
نویسندگان
چکیده
In recent years, user-supplied reviews have increased to become widely prevalent on many websites. Some reviewers (users who comment on items) provide valuable information. Others provide information many people already know. Our goal is to identify credible reviewers who provide valuable information. Twomethods can be used to measure reviewer credibility: assessing reviewers based on the content of reviews that they have written in the past and assessing reviewers based on their review histories. By comparing these methods, we aim at obtaining knowledge to determine which method is most useful for identifying credible reviewers. Additionally, many features have been proposed for assessing reviews or reviewers in the previous methods, but they have not been compared. We compare these attributes and clarify what kinds of attribute are useful for identifying credible reviewers. key words: information credibility, product review, credible reviewer estimation, feature investigation, methodology investigation
منابع مشابه
Is This Opinion Leader’s Review Useful? Peripheral Cues for Online Review Helpfulness
With the growing popularity of online user-generated reviews, research has emerged to understand the mechanism of how a review is voted helpful, focusing on the central-route influences of review content and quality, yet little research has studied the roles of peripheral cues such as reviewer credibility and contextual factors. Drawing on the theories of elaboration likelihood model and source...
متن کاملAvatars and Expectations: Influencing Perceptions of Trustworthiness in an Online Consumer Setting
This study investigates how individuals process an online product review when an avatar is included to represent the peer reviewer. The researchers predicted that both perceived avatar and textual credibility would have a positive influence on perceptions of source trustworthiness and the data supported this prediction. Expectancy violations theory also predicted that discrepancies between the ...
متن کاملCS224w Final Report: Community-Based Yelp Personalization
People use Yelp to search for everything and get recommendations. When we are reading a review, we want to know if the review itself and the reviewer are credible. Thus, it helps if we can know the credibility of the reviewer. In turn, a reviewer might be motivated to write more high-quality reviews. The user scores can be incorporated into calculating new (and hopefully more accurate) scores f...
متن کاملEthical Patient Prioritization in Disaster Triage: A Protocol for a Systematic Review
Background: Disasters are medically defined as events in which the demands for patients’ care far exceed the available resources. In such situations, triage and rationing of limited resources are inevitable. A decision regarding triage needs not only scientific guidelines but also an ethical framework and supporting policies. This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of the criteria for...
متن کاملHow to Write a Reviewer Report
The peer review process helps editors to decide what to publish, and it ensures the quality and credibility of the papers as well as of the journal itself. The reviewer must identify any fault in the paper and provide constructive feedback to the authors so that they can improve their work before publication. Other researchers in the field provide this service to you when they review papers you...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- IEICE Transactions
دوره 95-D شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012